JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 27, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Juan Camilo Meneses Echavarria

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia De Tutela
  • Jueces de una misma jurisdicción y distintos distritos judiciales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se abstuvo de resolver el conflicto de competencia planteado, toda vez que los conflictos de competencia que se presentan en materia de tutela deben ser resueltos por el superior jerárquico de los respectivos jueces o tribunales, y que únicamente corresponde a la Corte Constitucional dirimir “aquellos que no puedan resolverse dentro de las respectivas estructuras jurisdiccionales de origen”.

Como en el presente caso se trata de un conflicto suscitado entre dos juzgados de familia de diferentes distritos judiciales, le corresponde a la Sala de Casación Civil y Agraria de la Corte Suprema de Justicia resolver la controversia entre los aludidos despachos.

En consecuencia, se remite el expediente de la referencia a la mencionada Sala para que dirima el conflicto suscitado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Abstenerse de resolver el conflicto de competencia planteado.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR el expediente a la Sala de Casacion Civil y Agraria de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para que ella defina cual de los dos juzgados es el competente para conocer de la accion de tutela incoada por Juan Camilo Meneses Echavarria contra el Ministerio de Educacion Nacional.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.